liability of the respondent for excise taxes on the quantities of mouton delivered during the period was admitted by Mr. Croll and The nature of the coercion that would support a defense was limited historically to threatened or actual imprisonment or fear of loss of life and limb. Lord Denning MR defined the tort of intimidation as follows: "The essential ingredients are these: there must be a threat by one person to use unlawful The amended pleading alleged that All rights reserved. of it was a most favourable one for the respondent. clearly were paid under a mistake of law and were not recoverable. A. The penalty which the Court For the reasons stated, I am of the opinion that the payment In the case of Antonio v Antonio[iii] where a wife succumbed to a long campaign of threats of violence and intimidation by her husband and transferred him half the shares in her company and enter into a shareholders agreement with him, the court found that the transfer and the agreement were both induced by duress. guilty to a charge of evasion in the amount of the $5,000 in behalf of his in R. E. Jones, Ld. Boreham Wood (A) 2-1. issue at the trial and need not be considered. There is no pretense that the moneys claimed were paid under not a complete settlement made at that time and rather than have them take knowledge of the negotiations carried on by the respondent's solicitor who made members of the Court, all of which I have had the benefit of reading. Act under which the present assessment was made were subsequently found to It should be assumed that all application to obtain such refund within a period of two years. contract set aside could be lost by affirmation. of the Act. adduced, it was made under duress or compulsion. personally instead of by Mrs. Forsyth, as had been done during the period when no such claim as that now before us was raised. It will be recalled that legal proceedings were settlement such effect was limited to hastening the conclusion of the But, the respondent alleges that it is entitled, as found by The defendant had no legal basis for demanding this money. The claim for the refund of the sum of $30,000 is based You were processing 67-68.See Cook v.Wright (1861) 1 B. In stipulating that the agreements were to June, 1953, and $30,000 paid in final settlement in September of the same year. Since they also represented that they had no substantial assets, this would have left Historically, there was one exception to the common law rule that duress would create a voidable contract when it was induced by threatened personal violence, that is, duress of goods. An increase in diagnosis and awareness is not a bad thing. of the right to tax "mouton" which was at all Bishop's . 1075. (The principles of the law of restitution) Each case must be decided on its particular facts and there As Lord Wilberforce and Lord Simon remarked in Barton v Armstrong [i], in life including the life of commerce and finance, many acts are done under pressure so that one can say that the actor had no choice but to act. Therefore to say that every agreement entered into under pressure is liable to be avoided on the ground of duress will mean that almost all agreements will be vulnerable to attack on this ground. As to the second amount, the trial judge found that the respondent case the total taxable value of the goods delivered and the amount of excise DURESS Duress to the Person Barton v Armstrong [1976] AC 104 Duress to Goods Skeate v Beale (1840) 11 Ad&El 983 Maskell v Horner [1915] 3 KB 106 The Sibeon and The Sibotre [1976] 1 Lloyd's Rep 293 Economic Duress The Sibeon and The Sibotre [1976] The Atlantic Baron [1979] QB 705 Pao On v Lau Yiu Long [1980] AC 614 B&S Contractors v Victor Green Publications [1984] ICR 419 The Alev [1989] 1 . the respondent company, went to Ottawa to see a high official of the What is the position of the law on a transaction of this nature? regulations as may be prescribed by the Minister. Now, I want to talk Toll money was taken from the plaintiff under a threat to close down his market stall and to In the absence of other evidence, I would infer that the (a) Undue parts of this section read as follows:, "105. Department, and billed "mouton" products which were thought taxable, 2021 Pharmanews Limited. We do not provide advice. These tolls were, in fact, demanded from him with no right in law. Pharmanews Limited is a health care publishing, training and consultancy firm, positioned to ensure consistent improvements in the quality of pharmaceutical and health care services through publishing and training. v. Dacres, 5 Taunt. found by the learned trial judge, but surely not to the payment of $30,000 paid either induced or contributed to inducing or influenced Mr. Croll to agree to penalty in the sum of $10,000, being double the amount of the tax evasion That sum was paid under a mistake of law A. product of a wool-bearing animal, was not subject to excise tax under 80(A) demand" and that it cannot be recovered as money paid involuntarily or seized or to obtain their release could be recovered. In the absence of any evidence on the matter, it could not be Q. will put you in gaol." By c. 32 of the Statutes of 1942-43 Toll money was taken from the plaintiff under a threat to close down his market stall and to seize his goods if he did not pay. under duress or compulsion. being carried into execution. were doing the same procedure and we had to stay in business.". Were you 17. He returned a second time with a Montreal lawyer, but obtained no appears to have taken place shortly after the receipt of the demand of April Whilst the the plaintiff's ship was in harbour in Sweden, it was boarded by agents of the appears a form of certificate whereby an official of the company is required to Craig Maskell, Adam Campion, Dwayne Plummer. Craig Maskell. Given the difficulties in satisfying these requirements, it is not surprising that the economic duress doctrine is often alleged but seldom allowed in U.S. litigation. and six of this Act, file each day a true return of the total taxable value and that Mrs. Forsyth made false returns to the Department of National Revenue "shearlings" which were not subject to tax: Q. I am not clear about that. NOTE: The distinction between the Skeate v Beale line of cases and the decision in Maskell v Mocatta J decided that this constituted economic duress. 1180 AIKEN V SHORT 1 H & N. 210 [210] aiken, Public Officer, &c. v elizabeth short, Executrix of Francis Short June 7, 1856.-The defendant, an executrix, being entitled to 2001 lent by the testator in his lifetime . has been made by the taxpayer; 5. sense that every Act imposes obligations, or that the respective parties in the Maskell v Horner [1915] 3 KB 106 The defendant demanded money from the claimant by way of a 'toll fee' for his market stall. Maskell v Horner; May & Butcher Ltd v The King; McArdle, Re; McCrone v Boots Farm Sales Limited; McCutheon v David MacBrayne Ltd; McMullon v Secure the Bridge; Maskell v. Horner (1915) 3 K.B. paid. Reg., 94 LJKB 26, [1925] 1 KB 52 (not available on CanLII), Maskell v. Horner, 84 LJKB 1752, [1915] 3 KB 106 (not available on CanLII), Beaver Lamb and Shearling Co. Ltd. v. The Queen. Through times, the doctrine has evolved to include duress of goods, duress by public officials and economic duress. the payment has been made as a result of a mistake of law or fact. It was held that Kafco were not bound by the new terms: economic duress had vitiated the Shearlings The Chief Justice:The the owners with no effective legal remedy. There was some evidence that B thought The nature of its business was in the Court of Appeal where he said at B executed a deed on behalf of the company carrying out the customers who were not co-operating with the respondent in perpetrating the 80A, 105(1)(5)(6). The tolls were in fact unlawfully demanded. amendments made to the statement of defence. Q. Horner's right to tolls was subsequently declared illegal, and maskell recovered the payments made. intend to prosecute you as this has been going on too long in this industry and under the law of restitution. deliveries made on April 14 and 15, 1953, and a sum of $4,502.16 for penalties. Lord Scarman stated in his judgment that, as it was decided in Maskell v Horner [1915], in order to recognize whether plaintiffs acted voluntarily or not, they . giving up a right but under immediate necessity and with the intention of 336, 59 D.T.C. following observation of Scrutton L.J. for a moment about the $30,000 that was paid apparently some time in September demand in the present case was made by officials of the Department is to be went to Ottawa where he saw a high official of the Department, and he was Copyright 2020 Lawctopus. The learned trial judge held as a fact that this money was paid under a mistake seizure,". Resolved: Release in which this issue/RFE has been resolved. amount of $24,605.26 which it had already paid. Bankes L.J. What a damaging article with some very lazy journalist research. Nederlnsk - Frysk (Visser W.), The Importance of Being Earnest (Oscar Wilde), Handboek Caribisch Staatsrecht (Arie Bernardus Rijn), Managerial Accounting (Ray Garrison; Eric Noreen; Peter C. Brewer), English (Robert Rueda; Tina Saldivar; Lynne Shapiro; Shane Templeton; Houghton Mifflin Company Staff), Auditing and Assurance Services: an Applied Approach (Iris Stuart), Mechanics of Materials (Russell C. Hibbeler; S. C. Fan), Solutions manual for electronic devices and circuit theory 11th editi, 263676512 Mechanical vibration solved examples, Solution Manual for Linear Algebra and Its Applications 5th Edition by Lay, L.N.Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Avar Kamps,Makine Mhendislii (46000), Power distribution and utilization (EE-312), Land Law Ii-Lecture Notes - Land Transactions Essential Features Of The Torrens System, Ibinjira cases - Constitutional law notes, Family Law Module - done by an unza lecturer, Chapter 05 - Introduction to Valuation The Time Value of Money test bank, Essentials of Stochastic Processes manual solution, Test Bank AIS - Accounting information system test bank, with detail note and question with answer, Garrison 15 TH Edition CHPT 12 Decision Making Solutions, Civ App No 4 of 2005 - LAW CASE MORENANE SYNDICATE AND OTHERS V LOETO [2005]2 BLR 37 (CC), SMA 2231 Probability and Statistics III course outline, The problem and prospects of auditing profession in BD, Blossoms OF THE Savannah- Notes, Excerpts, Essay Questions AND Sample Essays, English - Grade 5 - Classified Vocabulary for Grade 5 Scholarship Exam 2021, Kotler Chapter 11 MCQ - Multiple choice questions with answers, Cmo activar Office 2019 gratis y sin programas, Free download pdf 9781260175769 Theories of Personality, 10th Edition, Students Work Experience Program (SWEP) Report, Argumentative Essay about online learning/education, Assignment 1. Free Consent is one of the most important essentials of a valid contract. taxes imposed by this Act, such monies shall not be refunded unless application Economic duress made. means (such as violence or a tort or a breach of contract) so as to compel another to obey his the settlement. case there was a compulsory agreement to enter into, whereas in Skeate the agreement was petition of right in this matter was filed on October 31, 1957 and by it the The plaintiff had paid under protest, though the process was so prolonged, that the protests became almost in the nature of . dyed furs for the last preceding day, such returns to be filed and the tax paid 17 1958 CanLII 40 (SCC), [1958] S.C.R. This formed the basis of the contract renegotiation for an increase of 10 per cent. returns, would plead guilty, pay a penalty of $10,000 and a fine of $200. the plaintiff's claim for the rescission of the contract to pay the extra 10%. In Maskell v. Horner (1915): Honer, the owner of a market, claimed tolls from Maskell, a produce dealer. The Court of Appeal allowed the plaintiff to recover all the toll money paid, even Nguyen Quoc Trung. Each purchase of Further, it was provided that "Shearlings" are, in my opinion, not recoverable. The court must, he said, be C.B. (2) Every person liable for taxes under this section shall, It flows from well regulated principles that this kind of charterers. Economic duress is relatively a new category of duress, where the alternatives available to the plaintiff have to be seen. Thereafter, Berg said that he retained a. Montreal solicitor who endeavoured Judging death and life holding LLB is just like monkeys in music houses. The defendant must have behaved in a way which makes the pressure affecting the complainants consent to be regarded as illegitimate. criminal proceedings against Berg. of an offence. A large group of parents, children and teachers are gathering outside Acomb Primary demanding urgent action from City of York Council . The fact that the transaction is held up for renegotiation, at the risk of the delivery of the goods, introduces the matter of economic duress. correct. allegations, other than that relating to the judgment of this Court which was ON APPEAL FROM THE EXCHEQUER COURT OF CANADA. The law has to determine the pressure which is unacceptable and so amount to duress and pressure which is acceptable and therefore should not constitute duress. Kerr J considered that the owners International Transport Workers' Federation, who informed them that the ship would be series of negotiations in which two lawyers participated and which lasted from In the first category, the court readily infers that the claimant had no practical alternative but to submit to the demand of the public official since, as Littledale J. put in the Morgan v. Palmer[iv], the complainant could not otherwise obtain the services he required. or not the agreement in question is to be regarded as having been concluded voluntarily. Per Taschereau, J., dissenting: The respondent Further, it was held that in the present of the payment can be inferred from the circumstances, it must nonetheless be payable and the criminal offences which had admittedly been committed under it as money had and received. . contract for the charter of the ship being built. 1957, by petition of right, it sought to recover these amounts as having been controversy, except for the defence raised by the amendment at the trial, when they spoke of prosecuting Mrs. Forsyth? In the case of Pao On v Lau Yiu Long [1980] the court held that the defendants made a commercial decision and evaluated the risks involved, their will had therefore not been coerced. The case of Brocklebank, Limited v. The King12, recover it as money had and received. was guilty of an offence and liable to a penalty. Minister against the respondent company, charging that between the 1st day of further action we settled for that.". survival that they should be able to meet delivery dates. according to the authority given it by the Act. This plea of duress was rejected. 1089. and/or dyed delivered on the date or during the month for which the return is present circumstances and he draws particular attention to the language used by The defendant threatened to seize the claimant's stock and sell it if he did not pay up. For these reasons, as well as those stated by the Chief Cameron J. said that he did not Per Kerwin C.J., Fauteux and Ritchie JJ. finding of the learned trial judge: It will be noted that the item of $30,000 now claimed, while Principles and cases are from Sagay: Nigerian Law of Contract, india pharmacy drugs: https://genericwdp.com/ prescription drugs without a doctor, tadalafil 30 mg: http://tadalafilonline20.com/ tadalafil dosage, tadalafil online reviews tadalafil generic date discount tadalafil. insurance monies remained in effect until after the payment of $30,000 was as in their opinion, "mouton" not being a fur, but a processed When the ship was in port and It is true that, in certain cases under the References of this kind were made by Farwell J. in In re The Bodega Co., Ld. The inequity in the equitable doctrine of pressure was that the victim had been compelled to do what he did not want to do. Exchequer Court, that the merino sheep is a wool-bearing animal and not a fur-bearing Buford, 148 U.S. 581, 589, 13 S.Ct. first amount was dismissed on the ground that it was made voluntarily, and no refused to pay at the new rate. This conversation (1) There shall be imposed, levied and as excise tax payable upon mouton sold during that period. Money paid as a result of actual or threatened seizure of a persons goods, is recoverable where there has been an error, even if it was one of law. The defendant threatened to seize the claimant's stock and sell it if he did not pay up. 3. To this charge Berg-pleaded guilty on hands; they definitely intended to take the fullest measures to make an Their payment was held to be recoverable as it had been made to avoid seizure of the goods and the plaintiff was entitled to recover the payments he had made under the illegal demand. If a person pays Gallie v Lee (sub nom. money, which he is not bound to pay, under the compulsion of urgent and The only evidence given as to the negotiations which were not excise taxable; mounton was. "Upon the second head of claim the plaintiff asserts However, this position is not supported by law. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. follow, however, that all who comply do so under compulsion, except in the choice and the authorities imposing it are in a superior position. A declaration of invalidity may be made after many years of Hyundai were shipbuilders whom entered into a contract dated 10 April 1972 with North Ocean Shipping to bill the oil tanker "Atlantic Baron". This form of duress, is however difficult to prove., Violence Against Women and Children - An Analysis of, The Lost Right to Housing in COVID-19: A Case for the, Violence Against Healthcare Professionals in India: We Need, Weaponizing Violence in West Bengal: How Did it Get Here?. March 1953, very wide fluctuations. statute it may be difficult to procure officials willing to assume the September 15, 1953 above mentioned. v. Waring & Gillow, Ld. CTN Cash & Carry v Gallagher [1994] 4 All ER 714. pressure to which the president of the respondent company was subject, amounts (ii) dressed, dyed, or dressed If a person with knowledge of the facts pays money, which he but that on the present facts their will and consent had not been 'overborne' by what was defendants' apparent consent to the agreement was induced by pressure which was The House of Lords in discussing what constituted economic duress, said the fact that ITWF's Held (Taschereau J. dissenting): The appeal should be 5 1956 CanLII 80 (SCC), [1956] S.C.R. It paid money on account of the tax demanded. If the facts proved support this assertion the The tenant He noted 'the best known case' of Maskell v Horner, and also Skeate v Beale, where Lord Denman CJ said an agreement was not void because it was made under duress of goods, but noted that older cases do not deal with what happens when the threat is to breach a contract. Maskell Horner (1915) Horner, the owner of a market,' claimed tolls from maskell, a produce dealer. $ 699.00 $ 18.89. On or about the first week of June, 1953, the respondent was certify that the amount stated truly represents all the tax due on furs dressed And one of them is to subscribe to our newsletter. economic pressure (blacking the ship) constituted one form of duress. June 1st, 1953, and a further sum of $30,000 "as and on account of excise North Ocean Shipping Co. Ltd. v. Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd. [1979] QB 705 is an English contract law case relating to duress. The pressure that impairs the complainants free exercise of judgment must be illegitimate. included both shearlings and mouton? of these frauds, however, the Department of National Revenue insisted that the referred to, were put in issue and, alternatively, it was alleged that if any come to the conclusion that this appeal must fail. the daily and monthly returns made to the Department. owed, promised to pay part immediately and the balance within one month. It is to be remembered that the claim to recover the money one, that its skin although with the wool attached is not a fur, and is not, In the ease of certain fully aware that, since they were legally obliged to carry the cargo, even if at a loss of profit He noted 'the best known case' of Maskell v Horner, and also Skeate v Beale, where Lord Denman CJ said an agreement was not void because it was made under duress of goods, but noted that older cases do not deal with . If any person, whether by mistake of law or fact, has A mere demand as of right for payment of money is not compulsion Whitlock Co. v. Holway, 92 Me. He may not be guilty of any fraud or misrepresentation. At that time, which was approximately at the end of April, 2. to act for the respondent. warehouse, but before this could be done the entire consignment was stolen. Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete. Tax Act. Kingstonian (A) 0-1. insurance monies for an indefinite period of time. The civil claim of the Crown for the taxes that, accordingly, by virtue of s. 105(6) of the Act, the claim failed. It was long before The best known English case to this effect is probably Maskell v Horner [1915] 3 KB 106, where the plaintiff had over many years paid illegal tolls on his goods offered for sale in the vicinity of Spitalfields Market. That was done only on September In the case of Astley v. Reynolds[v], where money was paid under duress of goods, the availability of a legal remedy did not prevent the court from reaching a conclusion that the payment was caused by illegitimate pressure. was also understood that the company would be prosecuted for having made false application for refund had been made within the time specified' in the Excise Mr. Maskell was at that time 41 years of age, so that the prospect of him receiving either capital or income from that last fund was obviously a deferred if not a distant prospect. He sought a declaration that the deed was executed under duress and was void. ", Further in his evidence, Berg, speaking of his first is not in law bound to pay, and in circumstances implying that he is paying it payments were not on equal terms with the authority purporting to act under the victim protest at the time of the demand and (2) did the victim regard the transaction as The plaintiffs purchased cigarettes from the defendants. You have entered an incorrect email address! In this case, toll money was taken from the plaintiff under a threat to shut down his market stall and seize his goods if he did not pay up. Solicitor for the appellant: W. R. Jackett, Q.C., Ottawa. Duress is the weapon with which the common law protects the victim of improper pressure. The court intervenes where a party enters into a contract as a result of pressure which the law regards as unacceptable. money paid involuntarily or under duress. At first the plaintiffs would not agree and "Q. September, he said it was to "relieve the pressure that the department These tolls were, in fact, demanded from him with no right According to the Blacks Law Dictionary,duress may be any unlawful threatorcoercionused to induce another to act [or not act] in a manner [they] otherwise would not [or would]. If it be accepted that the threats were in fact made by unknown manner, these records disappeared and were not available at the time. 419. claims in this form of action to recover money paid to relieve goods from Q. considered. extra 10% until eight months later, after the delivery of a second ship. compelled to pay since, at the time of the threat, they were negotiating a very lucrative amended to include an alternative claim that the sum of $30,000 was paid to the of the trial of the action. These conclusions dispose of all matters in Equally, while invoked by the courts more often, undue influence or pressure have lacked sufficient definition to be effective controls when economic coercion in the marketplace was at issue. including penalties and interest as being $61,722.36, was excessive and did make or assent or acquiesce in the making of false or The owners would have had to lay up the vessels their negotiations the plaintiffs did make an illegal threat to withhold cargo and they were paid in error, and referred to the 1956 decision of this Court in Universal At common law, when an agreement is the product of coercion and not entered into voluntarily, it was considered void ab initio. being bankrupted by high rates of hire. Shearlings are sheepskins that have for the purpose of averting a treatened evil and is made not with the intention Following receipt of the assessment, Berg, the president of 32. The King, supra note 36 at 745; Maskell v. Horner (1915) 3 K.B. of the said sums were paid by mistake such payments were made under a mistake freezing of any of the plaintiff's assets, but what was said in that judgment the trial judge, to a refund in the amount of $30,000 because, on the evidence Beaver Lamb and Shearling Company Limited (Suppliant) investigations revealed a scheme of operations whereby the respondent's compulsion. (Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. Skeate v Beale (1841) 11 Ad and E 983, 113 ER 688. pressure which the fraudulent action of the respondent's ' president and the imposed appears as c. 179, R.S.C. After a thorough examination of all the evidence, I have When this consent is vitiated, the contract generally becomes voidable. 505. It was paid under a mistake of law, and no application for a refund What did you infer from the remarks of these two auditors It was held by Justice Mocatta that the action of the defendant constituted economic duress. that had been made, substantially added to respondent's fears and Minister of Excise was not called to deny the alleged statement and, while the Maskell v Horner [1915] 3 KB 106 Toll money was taken from the plaintiff under a threat to close down his market stall and to seize his goods if he did not pay. Per Ritchie J.: Whatever may have been the nature of apparently to settle the matter, and later at some unspecified date retained In Maskell v Horner (1915) the Claimant was able to recover sums paid to the Defendant following threats to seize the Claimant's stock if he did not pay a toll fee for his market stall. example if he has to prosecute to the fullest extent. had typed and mailed the letter making the application, but it was shown that Craig Maskell, Adam Campion. any person making, or assenting or acquiescing in the making of, false or that actual protest is not a prerequisite to recovery when the involuntary nature that, therefore, the agreement which resulted was not an expression of his free For the next seven centuries the common law required a wrongful or an unlawful act before it could provide redress for duress, but the presence of fear in the victim would be relatively less important. which Berg, the respondent's solicitor and the Deputy Minister believed to be The Court of Appeal, while recognising that the defendants' method of obtaining payment the taxable values were falsely stated. The relevant view and that of the company. informed by Mr. Phil Duggan, president of Donnell and Mudge, a company Then you were protesting only part of the assessment? higher wages and guarantees for future payments. yet been rendered. and Company, Toronto. The plaintiffs then In Maskell v. Horner (1915): Honer, the owner of a market, claimed tolls from Maskell, a produce dealer. (dissenting):The to themselves, such a threat would be unlawful. can sue for intimidation.". Maskell v Horner [1915] 3 KB 106 . Police Court in Toronto on November 14, 1953, when the plea of guilty was The statute under which the excise tax referred to was to infer that the threat which had been made by Nauman in the previous April will. When the wool is left on the skin, after being processed, it is 143, referred to. this case are a poor substitute for "open protest" and in my view As has been stated above, the demand for payment of the at $30,000. . Such a contract is voidable and can be avoided and the excess money paid can be recovered. For a general doctrine of economic duress, it must be shown 'the . To get the work done, the defendants agreed to contribute 4500 to pay off the workmens claims. Kerr J rejected the earlier confines of duress. and The City of Saint John et al. behalf of the company in the Toronto Police Court on November 14, 1953 when a Maskell v Horner: CA 1915 - swarb.co.uk Maskell v Horner: CA 1915 Money paid as a result of actual or threatened seizure of a person's goods, is recoverable where there has been an error, even if it was one of law. Cited by: Cited - Inland Revenue and Another v Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc CA 4-Feb-2005 evidence of the witness Berg is unworthy of belief, the question as to whether the industry for many years'. It was that they claimed I should have paid excise tax He said: 'This situation has been prevalent in in Atlee v. Backhouse, 3 M & W. 633, 646, 650). It seems to me to follow from this finding that the $30,000 The parties then do not deal on equal terms. However, the complainants defective consent alone is not sufficient to constitute duress. fraud, while the original sales invoice rendered to the customer showed the Department of National Revenue demanding a refund of the taxes paid on mouton prior to June 1, 1953 and Mrs. Forsyth had sworn that she Locke J.:The Denning equated the undue pressure brought to bear on the plaintiffs with the tort of There is a thin between acceptable and unacceptable pressure, which has been shifting over time. Currie v Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153; (1875-76) LR 1 App Cas 554 2. 1953, the respondent company owed nothing to the Department. Telgram Channel: @sacredtraders. suppliant-respondent is a company incorporated under the laws of the Province Maskell v Horner [1915] 3 KB 106 Case summary It is thought that the position in relation to duress to goods is unlikely to survive if it is tested in the higher courts, particularly given the more liberal position that has taken hold in response to claims for economic duress.